Best Convertible For Tall Drivers For Mac

• Best Convertible For Tall Drivers For Macbook

Drivers, Loafers & Slip-Ons. Oxfords & Derby Shoes. Sandals & Flip-Flops. Rebecca Minkoff Women's Mini Mac Leather Convertible Crossbody Bag Leather Cross Body Bag. $195.00 4% off. Perfectly crafted for everyday use or even just for those special moments in life where you need to look your best. Home » Resources • Reviews • Shopping » The Ultimate Rear-Facing Convertible Carseat Space Comparison – Size Matters! The Ultimate Rear-Facing Convertible Carseat Space Comparison – Size Matters! Posted by Kecia On August 20. Best Convertible Carseats for Extended Rear-Facing: the definitive guide for savvy shoppers!

This is a really tricky category to pick a winner in, because there are so many high quality ultraportable laptops on the market today. Every company, from Dell to Asus, Lenovo, Apple and HP and more, all have a fantastic top-end laptop option, and to be honest, for the most part you can’t go wrong with many of these flagship models. In the past I’ve been a huge fan of the, and, and all three of these options came into serious consideration for this category, however when dialing down into features and performance, the standout option in our opinion is the. The ZenBook offers something the other laptops do not: a proper discrete GPU. It may not be a powerful GPU capable of hardcore gaming, but the GeForce MX150 included in this laptop is much faster than Intel’s integrated graphics, even though it’s the ‘slower’ 1D12 variant of this GPU. As for the CPU? We’d only recommend something with at least a quad-core in 2018, and in the case of most premium ultraportables, that’s Intel’s 8th-gen Kaby Lake Refresh line.

The ZenBook 13 is equipped with either the Core i5-8250U or the Core i7-8550U depending on the price, along with RAM and storage options that start at 8GB and 256GB, respectively. Those are standard specs for a high-end laptop and we’d expect nothing less. Other than that you get a 13.3-inch 1080p touchscreen, which we prefer over high-resolution options for the extra battery life it provides. Speaking of battery, the included 50 Wh battery isn’t the largest we’ve seen, but reputable reviews suggest it’s on par with the other laptops we considered for this category, namely the XPS 13 9370 and ThinkPad X1 Carbon 6th-gen. We’d never settle for short battery life and that’s not something you’d have to worry about with the ZenBook 13. While a really solid choice and we particularly love the discrete GPU, the ZenBook 13 isn’t perfect.

It’s missing Thunderbolt 3, and the keyboard isn’t as good as what you’d get with something like a ThinkPad. With that said, it offers a highly competitive set of hardware, making it more affordable than similarly-configured options from Dell and Lenovo’s high-end ultraportable lines. Factor in the attractive value proposition and the UX331UN is a great choice. For a little more money Configured properly and for a little more money (starts at $1,150), a solid runner up in this category is the. A more serious business laptop that is just as portable (2.5 pounds) sporting a 14' IPS screen, great connectivity including dual Thunderbolt 3 ports, a better keyboard and faster storage than the ZenBook. There is no option for a discrete GPU, but if you're lucky you can catch one of Lenovo's many deals offered throughout the year. As of writing, I configured a top-end black X1 Carbon with a Core i7-8550U processor, 16GB RAM and a 512GB NVMe SSD for a total of $2,093.00, after discounts the system went.

I did not add display options which include a 4K resolution screen or multitouch which is available on the regular 1080p display or 4K. A side note for Mac users We acknowledge Mac users are on a minority here on TechSpot, but you should know that as of writing, we are expecting Apple to refresh the current line of MacBooks in the coming days and weeks as WWDC inches closer. We don't expect major design changes, but it remains to be seen how aggressive Apple gets with spec bumps, fixing their keyboards, and pricing. We don't recommend to buy any Macs until the new models arrive (early June).

Our Best Mac Laptop for most, the competes in the premium ultraportable category. Apple makes fine laptops, usually pricier, but very well built and running macOS which is unique to them. Our pick for the best convertible laptop almost made it into the list as best ultraportable overall, however with a starting price of nearly $2,000 for a suitable configuration (a less powerful version running a Core i5 with no discrete graphics ), it’s not the most affordable option for everyone. However the 13-inch Microsoft Surface Book 2 does provide an extremely compelling feature set including the best hardware you can get in a 13-inch form factor, combined with a screen that detaches from the base for those times you need a portable tablet. When you choose the Core i7 model, you get Intel’s top-end Kaby Lake Refresh CPU, the Core i7-8650U, but on top of that you also get a GeForce GTX 1050 discrete GPU, which is much more powerful than the MX150 we typically see in these sort of devices. And that extra power does help to drive the gorgeous, high-resolution 3000x2000 13.5-inch LCD, which features a 3:2 aspect ratio that’s awesome for productivity apps. The list of features doesn’t stop there.

The touchscreen display supports the best active stylus in the business, the Surface Pen, which is a $100 optional extra but is definitely worth it for those that like to annotate and draw. The magnesium chassis is one of the best you can get on any laptop, and it now includes USB-C, though there’s no Thunderbolt 3 support. The battery life is also quite good for a laptop that’s so powerful. Our favorite configuration of the Surface Book 2 would be, which provides the Core i7, GTX 1050, 16GB of RAM and 512GB SSD.

It is a very expensive laptop – there are definitely cheaper convertible laptops going around – but you won’t find anything as powerful. The race really isn’t that close in our opinion: the Surface Book 2 is what you buy when you want the best. It was only a few months ago that Intel released their new line-up of six-core Coffee Lake processors for laptops. So far, most of these CPUs have ended up in gaming laptops, but sometimes you might be after a more professional, portable, productivity-oriented device that’s not as expensive, but still provides high-performance hardware. Ticking all those boxes is the, which is our current choice for those that need productivity power on the go. The Dell XPS 15 has been a favorite of ours for some time now, but the new 9570 model provides such a great combination of performance, portability and price. For $1,700 or so, you get a six-core Intel Core i7-8750H CPU, 16GB of RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 15.6-inch 1080p display with super slim bezels, and a GeForce GTX 1050 Ti discrete GPU, plus a huge 97 Wh battery and Thunderbolt 3 connectivity.

Now this isn’t the cheapest laptop to include this sort of hardware; you can quite easily find a chunky gaming laptop for around $1,200 like the that will satisfy your hardware craving. But the key thing about the XPS 15 is its portability and battery life: the overall laptop footprint is smaller due to slimmer bezels, it’s more than a kilogram lighter, and we’re looking at a thickness of more like 15mm rather than 24mm. All while providing a battery that’s more than 50% larger and lasts considerably longer. There are other slim and light gaming laptops out there like the MSI GS65 and Gigabyte Aero 15, both of which provide an equivalent CPU and faster GPU.

But even though these are slim and light gaming machines, the Dell XPS 15 is still more portable and several hundred dollars cheaper while preserving key productivity oriented features. Sure, the discrete GPU is just a GTX 1050 Ti rather than a GTX 1060 like you’ll get with a decent portable gaming laptop, but the 1050 Ti will be more than enough for tasks like video editing, code compiling, simulations, and so forth. Plus if you want to do more than just occasional gaming, a gaming laptop might be a better option for you anyway. I’ve recommended this laptop before and I’ll recommend it again because it provides such great value for money. If are on a budget and simply want the best hardware you can get, look no further than the Acer Aspire E 15, which retails for around $600. A lot of the hardware this laptop provides you’ll also find in top-end devices, yet you’re saving upwards of $400 and that’s no small amount for a budget shopper. The Aspire E 15 has everything you will want from a hardware perspective: a quad-core Core i5-8250U, GeForce MX150 discrete GPU, you also get 8GB of RAM and a 256GB SSD, which are both great inclusions in an entry-level product.

We wouldn’t recommend buying a laptop with no SSD and with less than 8GB of RAM, but this Acer machine includes both. The display is a basic 15.6-inch 1080p LCD and the battery life is decent but not outstanding. The key thing you don’t get with this budget laptop that you do get with the more expensive ultraportables we mentioned earlier, is a fancy design. The Aspire E 15 has a basic chassis that lacks the slimness, lightness, and metal class of the best laptops. At 2.4 kg heavy it’s not the most portable 15-inch laptop going around, but what this thing lacks in design and build, it makes up for in performance. Amazingly, though, the Aspire E 15 does include a USB-C port, though it is limited to just USB 3.1 gen 1 speeds, and there is also an 802.11ac Wi-Fi solution with MU-MIMO support. There’s even a DVD drive, something you don’t often see in laptops these days.

It’s not the absolute cheapest laptop on the market – you can get Atom-powered Windows devices and, of course, Chromebooks for less – but the combination of hardware and value makes the Aspire E 15 incredibly hard to pass up. Something Nicer, Slimmer Well Under $1,000 The may be less capable than the Aspire E 15, but it is also more portable at just 2.6 pounds on a 13-inch chassis, so it's nicer to carry around. If you're less concerned about performance for your buck, and simply want an inexpensive ultraportable that will handle day to day tasks without much fuss, this Zenbook is a great choice., the UX330 gets you an elegant aluminum build, Kaby Lake R Core i5 internals, a decent 1080p display, 8GB RAM, a backlit keyboard, integrated fingerprint reader, and a serviceable 256GB SSD. Asus has kept refreshing this laptop's specs at the same price point for a few generations now, it's a great portable alternative that also offers good battery life. What About a Chromebook? We don’t test a lot of Chromebooks here at TechSpot, but understandably you might want to purchase one over a Windows 10 machine if all you use a laptop for is web browsing and other light tasks.

At under $500, the is what we’d recommend, providing decent performance from its Core m3 processor and strong enough battery life. It also includes a 12.5-inch 1080p display in a respectable chassis, which is not bad for a budget system. A recent step up model, the is receiving many recommendations as of late.

It adds a QHD display and stylus support, but we wouldn't pay $600 for a Chromebook unless you've owned one before and are certain this is what you want out of a portable computing experience. Gaming laptops is such a broad subject that we could write an entire buying guide dedicated to it. So we did just that. Check out TechSpot's feature covering not just the most powerful and most expensive models on the market, but also practical options that provide great value for money, possess a thinner profile or how about a great ultrabook that doubles as a decent gaming machine. This is our personal favorite category of gaming laptops: portable designs with tons of power. We’ve already reviewed a handful of these devices over the last few years, but a few stand out that come loaded with the latest from Intel.

The best of the bunch so far is the. We were fans of MSI’s previous thin gaming laptop in the GS63, but the GS65 is an improvement in every way.

It has slimmer bezels surrounding a faster 144Hz 1080p display, and that helps shrink the entire footprint of the laptop. It’s still very thin and light for this class of device, and the new design with gold highlights looks better than ever. It’s MSI’s most refined laptop build yet. As for gaming performance, the GS65 comes with two GPU options, a GTX 1060 or GTX 1070 Max-Q. Either option is a sound choice at their respective price points, though the GTX 1070 Max-Q model is better suited to gaming on the 1080p high-refresh display, and gives you more power in the same form factor.

Other features like 16GB of RAM and a 512GB SSD are standard for this laptop and its competitors. We opted for the GS65 over competing laptops from Gigabyte and Asus for a couple of reasons. The GS65 is quieter than the similar during gaming, and the build quality is superior, with both laptops coming in around the same price. It was a tough choice between the GS65 and; the Zephyrus is more powerful with a full GTX 1070 inside rather than the Max-Q variant, but it’s also louder, hotter, and more expensive as a result. The GS65 has a larger battery and lasts longer, too, and that’s important for a portable gaming laptop. Either the GS65 or the Zephyrus would be our pick depending on what you were after, but if we had to choose just one, the more well-rounded GS65 gets our vote in this category.

Choosing the best Mac laptop is relatively straightforward, and in fact there has been no update to Apple’s laptop line-up since the last time we updated this list. As of writing, we are expecting Apple to refresh the current line of MacBooks in the coming days and weeks as WWDC inches closer.

We don't expect major design changes, but it remains to be seen how aggressive Apple gets with spec bumps, fixing their keyboards, and pricing. We don't recommend to buy any Macs until the new models arrive (early June). As it's usually the case with Apple's laptop offerings, there are only a few options and the best for your needs largely comes down to whether you want a smaller or larger machine. The 15-inch MacBook Pro is more powerful and correspondingly more expensive, but the 13-inch model is more portable and still highly capable.

There’s also an ultra-slim but weaker 12-inch MacBook for those that want something small. It's a great little machine but we wouldn't recommend it as your primary machine unless you're a casual user - you know, the kind that could also survive with an iPad as their primary computing device. After examining all three options, the is best suited to most consumers. It’s the most versatile laptop of the offerings, and essentially replaces the older MacBook Air by providing the power of a dual-core Intel Kaby Lake processors in a chassis just 15mm thick and 1.4kg heavy (3 pounds). It also has a high resolution 2560 x 1600 retina display, which is a feature that never made it to the Air. MacBooks are expensive for what you get on the spec sheet.

The base 13' model is $1,299, and for that price you’re only getting a Core i5 processor with 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. This variant, which comes without Apple’s Touch Bar controls, has a very limited selection of ports as well, just two Thunderbolt 3 ports.

Touch Bar models are more expensive, we don't really like what the Touch Bar offers, however it's the only way you get better specs. For example, the $1,799 Touch Bar 13' MacBook Pro gets you a more capable Core i7 and four Thunderbolt 3 ports, plus better graphics and more storage. The is also a decent option if you are willing to stomach the $2,399 starting price.

It’s much more powerful than the 13-inch model, thanks to quad-core Kaby Lake processors and discrete AMD Radeon Pro graphics. The 15-inch Pro is built for high-performance productivity workloads like video editing, which is why 16GB of RAM is also standard. Again, we wouldn't buy a MacBook Pro until the newer models arrive. Worst case scenario, you can get a hefty discount on one of the current models.

That's actually incorrect advice for Toyotas. My first Toyota was a 1971 Crown, My last one was a 1984 Supra. All of my Toyotas went over 150,000 miles. The Supra went to 183,000. All were sold with engines that pretty much 'ran like new'. All had oil changes between 7000 and 12000 mile intervals. None were ever exposed to synthetic oil.

When the manufacturer recommends oil changes every 7500 miles, it's a conservative recommendation. Changing oil more frequently will have little benefit. The most critical thing you can do for your Toyota when it comes to oil is to make sure it is never more than a quart low. If you keep oil in your engine in a Toyota, the car will rust well before the engine ever fails. I'm 6'7' 230 lbs so not gigantic but I am above the mass production bell curve. I found the kia soul to be roomy as my head doesn't hit the roof, my knees aren't wedged in, I can drive the manual transmission relatively comfortable, the seats are significantly higher than most cars so that helps with blood circulation and comfort, the headrest will actually keep my head from whiplashing back (first time I've found that to be the case in a car) fitting where it's supposed to, and it's also one of the most inexpensive new cars available.

So I'd recommend trying this model out and adding it to your list. I'm 6'5, 385. I have driven a 2006 Mini Cooper S for the last 5 years and it is the most comfortable unmodified car I have ever owned. The front seats can slide all the way into contact with the rear, and I have heard of people as tall as 6'9-6'10 finding it to be comfortable to drive. Cargo space is limited and fuel economy isn't as good as many other subcompacts but it is a LOT of fun to drive and it does very well in crash tests (both simulated and the real 70 mph multicontact wreck I walked away from a few years ago AND after which my Mini was repaired). I have a feeling that it my bad mileage in it is because I just can't resist pushing it hard.

When I was looking to buy, the other cars on my shortlist were the Mazda 6, VW Golf, and Dodge Magnum. The roomiest driver appointment was the VW, by far.

But there were no R32's left to test drive and peaky the 1.8T was extremely underwhelming to drive. The Magnum/Charger was comfortable as well but priced way too high for me at the time and I was also dissatisfied by the lack of any manual transmission offerings. The Mazda6 was a big surprise. It was far roomier than other cars in its class and with the V6, it was pretty quick, too. I never got to drive the Speed6 variant but I know I would have loved it. The big downside that pushed me back to the Mini dealership was the Mazda's airbag-equipped B-pillars ecclipsing the shoulder space of a seat moved all the way back.

I'm 6'11' and currently drive a Chrysler intrepid '98 which i find very roomy inside but to get in and out of this thing can be agony sometimes as its so low to the ground. I'd love to get something more economical as well but the main priority is getting something that fits-any idea's? Have been thinking on a minivan and have heard that some of the new small cars fit tall people but someone close to 7 feet probably not. I have in the past driven VW rabbit and nissan sentra both of which i found not too bad. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I was going to suggest VW (Golf or GTI, although I suggest Golf because the sculpted seat in the GTI makes exit a bit more difficult), as it really is better situated for taller drivers (I'm 6'5' and can put on my helmet while in the car and don't even need to adjust the seat down to its lowest position). A salesman once suggested to me that German cars in general are designed to accomodate taller folks than Japanese cars (for instance).

This is unconfirmed, but someone I work with recently purchased a Kia Soul and tells me it has a tremendous amount of headroom, too (he's probably around 6'2'). Have not tried vws. Nissan cube is nice for my body type, short legs long torso.

I weigh about 600 lbs and currently drive a 96 ford windstar and a 91 caddy deville coupe. I have been looking for a new car and i believe there has never been a car designed with someone my size in mind which really there wouldnt be a great demand for them but it would seem that in designing something comfortable for someone my size everyone smaller would benefit. Cars and trucks that im able to get into, not so much be comfortable driving. Coupes including the cobalt, cavalier, and monte carlo. Ive not found a sedan that im able to get into except for a grand marquis i have not had a chance to try its sister cars.

Ford taurus, kia rio, pt cruiser, g6, jeep liberty, dodge caravan, chevy minivan, toyota tacoma ext and crew cab, do not work due to the following reason. Usually the distance between the steering wheel and the B pillar are what stops me from getting into most cars and minivans.

Ive gotten into a 2006 Ford Freestar and a 2005 Nissan Quest, Honda Oddessy was about the right size it seems, even drove the quest and enjoyed it but as far as being safe in an accident i do not believe there is a car made where the airbag is far enough from me to deploy without hitting me. Ext and crew cab trucks from ford and chevy, only two ive had a chance to try, seemed to have the most room of anything ive tried.

The honda element was almost big enough except for the steering wheel. Well I hope this helps someone thats looking for a vehicle. I'm 6'5', 250, of a large build all around and have a bad back. I wanted to share some observations I've made while shopping for a new car.

I drive a LOT, averaging 25k/year, and need something comfortable for long trips. I owned a Honda Fit, but the ergonomics and seats were so uncomfortable I traded it in within a year.

I very much liked my Edge, but it was sadly totaled two weeks ago. New minivans are all too expensive for me, and many used cars don't make financial sense for long-term/high-use ownership.

Trucks are all out because of Chicago laws that restrict open-bed vehicles from certain important roads. There are several standouts for me for driving position and comfort, but all lack fuel economy and become very expensive to own. The Ford Edge (and other Ford SUVs) combined good entry and ergonomics for me but are very expensive to fuel. The CX-7 and 9 are also comfy but require premium gas. The GMC Acadia (and GM sisters) are similar - comfortable, spacious and thirsty. The Maxima and Altima offer a lot of front-seat room/adjustability and are on the short list. The Jetta TDI Sportwagen offers great value and has been saved from the cost-cutting shortcuts seen on the sedans, but it's a car I basically have to fall to get into.

Getting in and out of low cars every day is not good for us tall folk. Subaru's Outback and Forester are both close on price to the Jetta (TDI trim) and are nicer to get in and out of, but suffer from a lousy-feeling drivetrain.

The Mazda 6 is comfortable if there is no sunroof. The other cheaper SUV/hatches are either too small or have glaring flaws. The Cube is enormous inside but is rubbish to drive. Loud, hard, slow. The Scion Xb's dash is set too low for me and I have a hard time reaching the controls. The Mini Cooper fits very well but has a harsh ride for long trips - I regularly spend 3+ hours in my car a day.

Right now I'm leaning towards the TDI because it ends up being a couple hundred dollars LESS a month to run than the others, thanks to the great mileage. I'm a bit of a corner-case, being tall and driving so many miles, so my options are even fewer than for most.

On top of it all, I play music and have to move large equipment around so a hatch is almost a must (I could just rent a van when needed). My uncle in Sweden drives a Ford Mondeo diesel wagon and I have been green with envy ever since driving it. The Mazda 6 is basically the same car but you can't get a wagon version in the states, nor a diesel. I'll just have to deal with the poor entry/exit. Well, my search for a tall person vehicle has been ongoing for years.

I keep looking and still drive my 2000 ford f-150 until we find something else. The worst, as a group, are vehicles with sunroofs- no headroom. Also, the mid-size cars seem to be worse than smaller cars. You would think that pickup trucks would be the best-think again.

Some trucks are good- the ford f-150 being one, and the fords older than 2003 are best. Some trucks have enough headroom but the windshield is too short, or the roof slopes down too far.

Examples: NissanTitan, Toyota Tundra after 2007, Chev Silverado. I can't see stop signs from these vehicles.

In suv's the Subaru Forester has OK headroom but the seats are terrible. The Honda CRV in models without sunroof have decent headroom and good windshield visibility. I would have bought one if they still came equipped with a manual 5 speed. The Honda Pilot has enough headroom in models without sunroof, but I didn't find the seats to be very good- the lumbar is too low for a tall guy. In cars, it's hard to beat the headroom in the Volkswagen new Beetle. Otherwise, I haven't found a passenger car I can sit in- either as a passenger or a driver.cheers, 2Grumpy.

Best Convertible For Tall Drivers For Macbook

I'm 6'7', 300lbs and recently traded in my 2008 Toyota Camry Hybrid (which was surpisingly comfortable but tough getting in and out of) for a 2012 Chevy Equinox 2LT. I absolutely love this car. It has a moonroof and I still have plenty of headroom, enough to do the fist test and pass. The rear seat slides back and reclines to give passengers more leg room if you typically have the drivers seat pushed all the way back. I have tons of leg room with the seat all the way back, but I can comfortably move it forward a few inches if I had to.

Even with my seat all the way back, I had a 6'1' adult sitting behind me with no issues. Very comfortable leather seat with lumbar and heat, nav system is terrific and the dash lights up in an Ice Blue color that looks fantastic at night. Throw in the power liftgate and backup camera and I was sold! I was between this and the 2011 Subaru Outback, but this had more legroom and was more comfortable overall. I'm averaging 26mpg so far, which isn't bad for an AWD vehicle. My right knee doesn't rest against the center console like in my Toyota, there is plenty of room.

Overall I couldn't be happier and I get tons of compliments. Great option for a tall person that has decent fuel economy, all wheel drive and lots of room, even with the moonroof!!:shades. Well, I am 6'6' and 270 lbs. Long torso so headroom is premium.

Best car I ever had for fit was my 2006 BMW 330I but too expensive to own. I traded the BMW in for a 2011 Kia Optima. This is a GREAT car for the $'s. VERY roomy both leg room and head room and still room in the back seat. Only drawback is that the seats aren't terrific for thigh support (a little short).

But all in all, for the $'s, you should really check it out. Oh, and a 200 hp 4 cyl that gets 35 mpg on the highway. Mine was $23K out the door, brand new.

I am 6'4' and my son is 6'6'. I needed a 'new' used car that would work for both of us and have adequate leg and headroom in both the front and back seats.

I wanted a sedan that was relatively new and had decent fuel economy. In the end, I bought a 2010 Camry Hybrid and I am very happy with it. One Saturday morning, I took my son with me and we did a tour of the local car dealers trying out all of the sedans we could find. This included Camry, Accord, Hyundai, Kia and Ford Fusion. I liked the Hyundai Sonata and that was my first choice based on looks. According to the specs on paper, it has the best front legroom (45.5'), good front headroom (40'), average rear headroom but relatively poor rear legroom.

The front seat does have good leg and head room. If you don't use the back seat much (at least for tall people), then this would be a pretty good choice for a tall driver. With the sloping roof line, the back seat would not be comfortable for six-footers. The only model choice is the GL because all of the rest have a sunroof and that makes the front headroom inadequate.

The GL does not come with an electric driver's seat (it may be an option if you buy it new). It does have an adjustable steering wheel. I still liked the car but it felt a bit cramped overall, even sitting in the front seat. We tried the Kia (same basic car as the Hyundai), the Accord (they didn't have one in stock without a sunroof) and the Fusion (felt cramped - especially in the back). I already have an older Camry and I really like it (even though front legroom is limited).

A newer Camry wasn't at the top of my list because the interior dimensions on paper just seemed average, Toyota has been having some reliability issues and the styling was pretty conservative. Once we sat in it, there was no turning back. Initially we tried a 2012 and it is a bit larger than the older models but not by much. The front leg and headroom was very good and with the electric driver's seat (and adjustable steering wheel), it made it even better.

With a squarer roof line than the Sonata (and most other sedans), the back seat was also very good for leg and head room. We started looking for used Camry's and I found a 2010 Hybrid that we liked so we bought it. We just finished a vacation trip to Florida in it and we found it to be very comfortable and at 40+ mpg, very efficient as well. Luggage room in the trunk is a bit limited because of the battery pack but the car fit three adults and our luggage quite adequately. For local use, it can comfortably fit 4 or even 5 adults with adequate headroom for six-footers in front and back. In conclusion, I recommend the Camry, and especially the Hybrid for its interior room as well as its efficiency. I did quite a bit of research on the Camry Hybrid and found that it has an excellent reliability record.

The Toyota engineers seem to have done a really good job on this car. Unlike the Prius, the Camry Hybrid feels pretty much like a normal car.

It has a lot of technology in it but this hasn't lead to lots of failures or expensive replacement of parts. With 2 engines and dual braking systems, many key parts aren't under as much stress as they would be in a normal gas engine car. The battery pack was designed to last for the life of the car and so far, that seems to be the case. I also learned that you have to try them out to get a real feel for the interior room. I still don't understand how the Sonata and the Camry can both be rated as having the same rear headroom (37.8') when they are, in fact, so different. There are quite a few Camry Hybrids so it isn't too hard to find a used one at a fairly reasonable price. I ended up paying about the same as I was expecting to pay for a used 2011 (non-hybrid) Sonata.

I am 6'7' approx 450ish. I currently drive a 2006 Dodge Ram Quad Cab which is far and away the most roomiest vehicle I have ever driven. I just bought a 2012 Kia Soul for my daughter who is 5'8' and took the opportunity to 'try on' Kia's SUV line. Given that I am evenly split (long legs long torso) nothing was really comfortable as a daily driver. I have several friends who bring by their trucks to see how I fit the Ford Series is hard on head room but ok on leg room. I test drove a 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche and was completely impressed.

I am in the market for a mid-sized SUV to replace my truck. The cost of fuel is KILLING me at 14 miles per gallon. I am going to try Honda, GMC and Hyundai.

I am hoping to stay 27k or less. Due to injuries sustained while I was military, cars are just too painful to get in and out of.that being said, my ex did get me to try her 2011 Yaris and she got a great laugh, it just was not designed for a guy with a 60' chest. So.after alot of research I finally went and purchased a 2012 GMC Terrain (SLE2). At 6'7' and girthy.'

Trying on' the car is always mandatory. It makes the shorter sales people celebrate that they are not taller and can be quite a laugh.

I first went and tried the 2012 Hyundai Santa Fe. It was a little short on head and legroom, though trying a model with power seats gave me about an inch to spare, but my knees were about 1/2' from the dash. I just could not imagine a long drive without road rage. I went next to GMC and tried the terrain.

It has about 2 1/2' more leg room than my Full-Sized Dodge Ram 1500 (quad cab) and about equal headroom. The hip room is snug but comfortable (God, I need to lose weight) and the shoulders had suprising room. I was going to try the equinox, but found out it is 3' more narrow than the terrain. While I was there, I sat in their full sized GMC SUV and OMG.what room!!! But I was determined not to pay almost $40k for my new car plus the economy would ave left me only a little better than staying in my truck. What fits in a car is very different depending on your build, I am cursed with a long body and a 36' inseam and a 60' chest.

I wish car dealers would tailor advertising a little toward our market. I found the Terrain easy to get in and out of with a tilt/telescoping wheel. It sits high enough to not be hard on my knees but low enough that I am not climbing into it. It uses E85 fuel so I am anticipating an almost $200 a month drop in fuel costs by moving from my Dodge to this.

At a $29k sticker price for the SLE2 package with power/heater seats and AWD It was an easy sell. Hello bigguy72712 - I found the exact same thing that you did with the GMC Terrain!! I am 6'7' with a 37' inseam and virtually gave up on finding an SUV with decent leg room and head room. It was by accident (literally) that I found the GMC Terrain. Our car was hit while at a stop light and we got the Terrain as a rental vehicle - I could not believe how much leg room there is once the seat is all the way back and tilted!

I can almost stretch my 37' inseam legs all the way out (seat back AND tilted back), and with the telescoping steering wheel, I can just reach the wheel. More room than any car (although the new Buick Regal has almost as much, but less shoulder room).

Also, the back seat slides forward/aft so with the back seat all the way back, there's a little room behind me (the driver) as well. For all you tall folks out there, please try the GMC Terrain (or the sister vehicle the Chevrolet Equinox - 2010 on) if you need leg and head room, you will be pleasantly surprised. Thank you GM for puting some leg room in your vehicles - if you put the seat back further, you can always slide the seat up if your short, but you can never slide it back. I am 6'5, over 300, 34' inseam, 56' chest.

The point isn't only what car is comfortable once you are in it, but getting in and out. I normally drive a 2009 Suburban (which I hate as it's slow, pondering handling and not that much room for how big it is) and it had to go in the body shop for 4 days, during which time I got a rental.

I tried a Chrysler 200. I couldn't even get in the car. A Chevy Impala was better, but the door opening was not long enough and swinging my legs in was a biotch. I settled on a Hyundai Sonata as I could get out of it better than the other two, but it was not a breeze. It seems to me that newer cars have both lower roof lines and even lower openings, probably for more structural rigidity to hold up better in a crash.

The thing is, it makes ingress and egress a pain, no matter what the ergos are once you get in and out of a car. My handicap is that I had my neck fused on three levels in January. I really don't want to have to get a truck as they are slow, handle poorly and get bad gas mileage. I really wanted that SS Camaro, but it won't work.:/. Hm, I didn't think they were ever offered over here with anything but an automatic. All you get in Europe is the 5 speed and a diesel, per Wiki.

If the gas mileage was a bit better, (and maybe it would get over 30 highway with a tall 5th gear), I could live with the lack of oomph. Be fun to outfit the back as a camping rig and the 4 GB indash computer could be fun too. If Ford can sell a niche vehicle like this in the US and make a profit, you'd think someone would figure out that there are a lot of larger people needing comfortable rides who don't want something big on the outside like a King Ranch pickup.